Comparative Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
here are the articles
English 101 Paper #3: Comparative Analysis
Formatting/Length: 4 Full Pages Minimum, Double-spaced, 12 Point Font, Default
Margins, Works Cited Page.
We live in a digital world that continually floods us with information and varying
perspectives on the issues that are important to us. This pluralism is a good thing, as it
introduces us to many perspectives and voices that we may never have heard, but it
also challenges us to think critically about how these different perspectives, ideas, and
arguments compare to one another and to our own arguments and ideas. We compare
things all the timemusic, movies, restaurants, classes, etc.but this assignment is
challenging you to go one step further by developing a comparative analysis, an
analysis that pays close attention to the differences and similarities of the arguments of
two different authors writing about the same issue.
choose two of articles and write a four-page rhetorical analysis that compares and contrasts the rhetorical and/or narrative arguments of each author and develops an evaluative claim
that explains to your own readers what your analysis tells them about the issue. Your comparison of the two different texts might lead you to endorse one position over the other and say it is a more persuasive argument, or it might lead you to consider a middle-ground between the two positions, or even to develop the claim that both authors miss an important issue or point. Your evaluation up to you, but you must be able to support it by pointing to clear evidence from the texts
Keys to Writing a Successful Comparative Analysis
spend some time outlining the key arguments, examples, and rhetorical
or narrative strategies of each article. Annotate each article carefully, looking most
specifically at their major thesis or overarching argument and the supporting
arguments and evidence that each author gives to support this argument. Spend
some time also analyzing the differences and similarities in the audience, purpose,
and context of each article. As you do this, you may find it useful to take a blank
sheet of paper and divide it into two columnsone for each authorand list out
major arguments and rhetorical strategies for each. This will help you visualize
points of comparison and contrast more easily.
Developing an Evaluative Claim:
remember that your goal or purpose is not simply
to compare and contrast, or say this essay is different than the other, but to develop
a claim about which essay you think advances the more persuasive argument or
another evaluative claimeach essay misses an important point, for exampleand
provide evidence from our analysis of the essays that supports this claim.
There are several ways you might organize a comparative analysis,
but since you are juggling two different texts, you will want to help readers keep
track of the information. You can do this by organizing the body of your essay in a
way that moves from text-to-text or theme-to-theme. If you are having trouble getting
started, you may find the approach below helpful. It moves text-to-text. This is not
the only way to organize your essay, though.
Summarizing the Different Perspectives:
in the introduction or in a body paragraph following the introduction, set up the context of the debate by summarizing how the different ideas you find in the essay you chose and in the texts you found through your research complement and disagree on the issue. Provide a clear but succinct
overview of the debate.
Articulating your Evaluative Stance: develop a thesis that clearly explains your
evaluative claim and the reasons you hold it. This means that you will want to
explain how you evaluate the debate between the different sources you find. Think
about the following questions: (1) What do we learn or understand through your
analysis of the different perspectives? (2) Does one perspective seem to be more
persuasive? (3) Are there problems with the arguments of each of the perspectives
that still need to be addressed? (4) Are there areas of common ground between the
perspectives that could change how we understand the debate?
Analyzing the Perspectives: in first part of the body of your paper, analyze the
different arguments on the issue from both the essay you chose from our readings
and the sources that you found through your research. Look specifically at the
claims that they make (their overall thesis), the evidence they use to support them
(reasons), and the rhetorical strategies that they use to persuade their audience.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.