Dealing with Complexity Scoring Guide
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
· Create an informative 12-minute video or audio news segment on a contemporary social issue.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies:
· Competency 1: Explain the nature of ethical issues.
o Explain the selected contemporary issue, with reference to practical instances.
· Competency 3: Engage in ethical debate.
o Describe the relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
· Competency 4: Develop a position on a contemporary ethical issue.
o Explain at least two distinct positions on the issue.
o Defend one’s personal ethical position on the issue.
· Competency 5: Communicate effectively in the context of personal and professional moral discourse.
o Create a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives
· Making responsible decisions about major public issues is more complex than a direct application of theory. One source of this complexity is the value of looking at the issue through a variety of disciplinary modes of inquiry:
· Psychology and sociology inform our views of individual and collective behavior.
· Mathematics and the sciences remind us that human life is part of a larger world.
· Literature and mythology encourage us to remember the power of good and evil.
· Medicine points out that what we do affects the health of our bodies.
· Communication and information technology help us learn to talk to each other.
Once again, your instructor has selected a few big issues that need to be considered from more than one of these disciplinary lenses. Learning how to integrate knowledge from multiple fields is a vital transferable skill for practical life.
Another source of complexity in dealing with a major issue is that there are many alternative solutions to think about. Intellectual honesty demands that we think critically about all of them.
· Be sure to describe and examine each alternative position fairly:
o Do not set up a simplistic version that will be easy to demolish rhetorically.
o Taking each opponents view seriously clarifies our own convictions.
· Apply critical thinking skills to the position you are defending, too:
o Think about what objections someone else might make to your view.
o Try to show clearly and honestly why you take this position.
Think of your thought on this issue as a chance to practice your skills for engaging in productive moral discourse from multiple points of view.
You have seen how difficult it is to work through a complex public issue by integrating disciplinary insights, debating alternatives, and defending your own position. Now, what are you going to do about it? Perhaps, there is another grand issue about which you care deeply, and the skills youve practiced here will work well in dealing with the complexity of that issue as well. The question remains, what will you actually do?
Take a moment to reflect upon what you have learned here. What matters is not some set of facts you have memorizedyou can always look up that stuff whenever you want. What does matter is what you can doidentify reliable sources, think critically about issues, engage in productive discourse, defend your positions well, and communicate effectively and creatively.
Like many of the elements of a liberal arts education, these skills are transferable to other aspects of personal, social, and professional life. Learning and growth dont stop at the end of a course or the completion of a program: they become life-long habits for achievement and success.
· Questions to Consider
As you think about the theme “dealing with complexity,” consider addressing the following questions:
· Which disciplinary lenses will you apply to your issue, and what resources have you found?
· Which of the alternative positions do you find more compelling, and why?
· What concrete actions will you now take to implement your own solution for the problem?
· How has our work together in this course changed the way you deal with ethical issues every day?
· Assessment Overview
As the producer and correspondent of a television or radio news magazine (like 60 Minutes, VICE News, or All Things Considered), you have been assigned to deliver an informative 12-minute segment on one of the contemporary issues being covered in this course. Corporate policy requires that you consider insights from two or more academic disciplines for example: nursing and social work, or philosophical ethics, psychology, and biology. (Note: These are only examples; you are free to choose your own disciplines!) It also requires that you interview credible representatives of at least two distinct positions on the issue. You need not remain neutral on the issue; in fact, you are expected to state and defend your own position with clear reasoning in your own words.
You will choose which of the complex social issues to present here. The intended audience for your segment is an intelligent but perhaps uninformed public, so this is your opportunity to engage them in an issue that matters to you.
The final script for your production should, of course, include APA-style citations and references.
You may submit the assessment itself in either of two formats:
1. Option One: Produce the video segment. You should appear as the correspondent, but you may enlist family and friends to play other parts. You might even take on distinct roles yourself, in a video selfie where you consider the alternatives accurately. Kaltura is recommended, but you may use any device or software of your choice, so long as you are able to submit the work to your instructor for assessment.
2. Option Two: Produce the audio segment as you would for broadcast as a radio program or as a podcast. Once again, you will be the correspondent, but you are welcome to invite others to participate or record yourself in different roles. As with the video option, you may record the audio in any way that suits you, making sure to submit the audio file or a link to it as the submission for assessment.
Include the following concepts in this assessment:
3. Explain the selected issue you selected, with reference to practical instances.
4. Describe relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
5. Explain at least two distinct positions on the issue, considering each fairly.
6. Defend your own position on the issue clearly.
Submit this assessment to your ePortfolio.
Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, as well as completing the official scoring guide for the assessment.
· Communication: Create a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives.
· Media presentation: Ensure your video or audio recording is a minimum of 12 minutes in length, with notes or a transcript to ensure accessibility to everyone. Upload the presentation.
· Resources: Use your judgment to ensure your topic is thoroughly researched. There is no minimum number of resources required, however.
· APA guidelines: Format resources and citations according to current APA style guidelines. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
· Font and font size: Use a font of appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24-28 points for headings and no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text
Dealing With Complexity Scoring Guide
Dealing With Complexity Scoring Guide
Explain the selected contemporary issue, with reference to practical instances.
Does not describe the selected contemporary issue, with reference to practical instances.
Describes the selected contemporary issue, with reference to practical instances.
Explains the selected contemporary issue, with reference to practical instances.
Analyzes the selected contemporary issue, with reference to practical instances.
Describe the relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
Does not list the relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
Lists but does not describe the relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
Describes the relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
Explains the relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
Explain at least two distinct positions on the issue.
Does not describe at least two distinct positions on the issue.
Describes at least two distinct positions on the issue.
Explains accurately at least two distinct positions on the issue.
Assesses accurately at least two distinct positions on the issue.
Defend one’s personal ethical position on the issue.
Does not state one’s personal ethical position on the issue.
States but does not defend one’s personal ethical position.
Defends one’s personal ethical position.
Defends one’s personal ethical position with the support of research.
Create a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives.
Does not create a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives.
Creates a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue, but the presentation lacks detail or does not include multiple perspectives.
Creates a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives.
Creates a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives, and the presentation is engaging and detailed.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.