legalistic approach vs problem-solving approach
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Review the legalistic approach and problem-solving approach during the arbitration hearing process. Then, develop two approaches that an organiation could use to make the typical arbitration.
* Review good faith bargaining.
* Discuss the major advantages and major disadvantages of your approaches.
* Provide your rationale for each approach.
Legalistic approach is the approach of legally applying the law for the total enforcement of its violation. It is easily practice due to its clarity. This approach analyzes legal questions that are characterized by logical reasoning focusing on legal text such as constitution, legislation, or case law, and not on social, economic, or political context. It enforcement is strict in adherence to the law. Legalistic approach pay much attention on violation of law and relies on threats of arrest because it strictly enforces the criminal laws which focuses on resolving disputes through formal methods.
Problem-solving approach is the approach of defining a problem and determining the cause of the problem. It also identfies, prioritizes, and selects alternatives for a solution as well as implements a solution. Any organization that wishes to be successful, its leadership must guide their employees and develop problem-solving techniques. This approach has four steps namely: Define the problem, Generate alternative solution, Evaluate and select an alternative, and Implement and follow up on the solution.
Good Faith Bargaining is a kind of negotiation in which all parties want and try to achieve a reasonable agreement that will have a positive outcome. It is a good faith because both parties are communicating and negotiating, and the proposals are being matched with counterproposal and both parties making every effort to arrive at agreements. When bargaining is done in good faith, it promotes rational, informed discussion that leads to a fruitful result.
For our discussion, I will consider the legalistic approach and the problem-solving approach. As legalistic deals totally with the enforcement of the law, there are some advantages and disadvantages.
– If the rules on the book are fair, it could lead to encouraging society to become more harmonious.
– The application of the rules are straightforward and if they are not followed, there will be punishment.
– someone will runs into problems when life complexities requires additional rules. Example. Murder is prohibited but then there needs to be a different in establishing murder and self defence.
– If there be a different in establishing murder and self defence, they would either need to be included within the laws or write a new laws to fit them.
Problem-solving approach defines the problem, determines it cause, and identifies its solution.
– Increases number of solutions.
– Helps to increase team’s potential.
– Reduces the possibility of bias.
– Increases competition.
– Time constraints.
– Unwillingness to participate.
Rationale for legalistic approach is to control crime, and remember that crime does not a universally agreed definition of what crime is. However, the better way you can think about crime is that crime is an act which is against the law and it is illegal. It is important to note that crime is a contested concept.
Rationale for problem-solving approach is to place focus on making sense of ideas because it develops power. Problem-solution approach provides tools that can be applied to solving hypothetical and real problems. It encourages one to believe in their ability to think better
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.