MKTG 1050 Buyer Behavior Final Assessment
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Assessment: Read the case study below and answer question one and any three out of the remaining four questions. This assessment contributes 50% to the total grade.
Assessment format: Take home, open book. There will be no invigilation. Student may take their time to draft and develop their answers.
Assessment answer submission due date and time: 11.59 PM, 13 June 2021
Word limit: Maximum 800 words per question (excluding references).
Assessment answer Format: Use the answer sheet uploaded. Typed in Word file, Arial, 11font size, single spaced.
Submission: Save as a pdf and upload on Canvas submission link
1. This is a summative piece of assessment that brings together your learning in the Buyer Behaviour course over the teaching period.
2. You are expected to complete this task individually without conferring with others.
3. Your instructor will not be providing any guidance or advice on how to complete the questions. You must not contact your instructor during the final assessment. All the information required in this regard is provided within this document and through your studies.
4. It is imperative that you complete the task precisely, with care and consideration of the principles, theories and practices of Buyer Behaviour.
5. Each question has a maximum limit of 800 words which must be adhered to. Exceeding the word limit will render your answer to that question void. At the end of each question, students must insert the word count in brackets, then add the list of references if applicable. Tables can be used; however, they form part of the word limit. Figures, images and diagrams are welcome, and they do not form part of the word limit. References do not form part of the word limit. Point form, sub-headings and similar elements that allow you to remain concise (but clear) are most welcome and encouraged. For question number one, students are expected to write about 150 words per part, and the total number of words for all five parts must not exceed 800 words.
6. You must use the answer sheet (uploaded) to answer the questions. Please then start each of the four questions on a new page and attempt the four questions in the order they are presented. You must not delete the instructions and the questions from the answer sheet. Your answers should be in black (and keep the instructions and questions in blue).
7. You are welcome to bold, underline, italicize, colour (main colour should still remain black) or highlight key points or areas for emphasis. Point form is welcome where applicable. Diagrams, images, tables etc. can be placed wherever they best fit and must be given a heading and source detail (if applicable).
8. Your work is submitted via our plagiarism detection software, and you must rely on your own learning and acquired knowledge. You are encouraged to do some website and database searches, but you must cite references if you do. You must use your own words and strategic insights in your answers.
9. Please note that this final assessment task is to be done individually and without consultation or discussion with others. Any student who is found to have breached this requirement through any form of media or contact will be investigated for academic misconduct.
10. Students are encouraged to use websites and database search, but you must cite your references using Harvard style referencing (word count does not apply to references).
11. Students are responsible for submitting their final assessment on time, as late submissions for final assessment will not be accepted. If circumstances prevent students from being able to submit their assessment by the deadline they will need to apply for special consideration.
12. Specific submission details will be posted before the submission date. Unlike the assignment submission, students will be able to submit this assessment only once. If you encounter any technical failure with Canvas or turnitin at the time you submit your assessment, you must email a copy of your assessment to Course Support Officer (firstname.lastname@example.org) and use
Buying an electric car.
Humanity is currently facing the challenge of the Great Transformation, a transition from the current fossil fuel-based economy towards a sustainable society within planetary boundaries. One highly important aspect of this transformation is the reduction of CO2 emissions to mitigate climate change, which requires major changes in many areas. One of the most important of these areas is the transport sector, which is responsible for 24% of global CO2 emissions. Energy demand for mobility is rapidly growing, creating a need for immediate energy-saving actions on all possible levels. This encompasses both an overall reduction in individual motorized transport as well as increased energy efficiency and use of renewable energies in motorized vehicles that are still being used. One important contribution to the latter is a shift from combustion engine cars to alternative-fuel cars. A promising technology in this regard is the electric car, defined as a car that is solely powered by a battery. Electric cars can contribute to mitigating CO2 emissions from car travel especially when production and usage are powered with renewable energies. However, in most countries, electric car adoption rates are still low compared to combustion engine cars.
One such car is Nissan LEAF. Carbon Tax was introduced in the same year the original Nissan LEAF battery-electric vehicle was launched in Australia. Seven years on and the second-generation LEAF arrived in 2019; cleaner, greener and palpably improved. The price of the new Nissan LEAF is at $49,990 before on-road costs. A Toyota Corolla hybrid can be had for $25,870,
a top-spec bells-and-whistles 2.5-litre Mazda3 for $36,990 and an all-wheel drive Mercedes-Benz A-Class for $49,500 (all plus on-roads of course). So the LEAF doesnt have price equivalency against Nissans usual competitors when they are powered by internal combustion engines (ICE).
Instead, it is up there with the premium brands.
In this paper, we investigate possible reasons for low electric car adoption rates from the perspective of environmental psychology. The context of our investigation was Germany in early 2016. We focus on households as an important target group owning the vast majority of passenger cars.
The public debate on the reasons for low adoption rates in Germany has strongly emphasized the role of financial and technological constraints. For households, the adoption of an electric car involves a higher purchase price than a combustion engine car, as well as the need to adapt to new characteristics of an innovative technological system (e.g., lower driving range, unfamiliarity with the charging system).1 From a psychological point of view, assuming that these aspects are crucial to understanding low electric car diffusion rates implies emphasizing the role of rationality in energy-related investment decisions. Household members might perceive certain benefits or disadvantages (e.g., for their household, themselves, or both) and weigh these aspects against one another in order to identify the most suitable investment object from a rational perspective. For example, we can assume that individuals are concerned about having a solid financial situation and a lifestyle that suits their personal comfort needs. Some rational motives underlying energy-related investment behavior (e.g., the desire to save money) may support the uptake of energy-saving investment objects, while others (e.g., desire for comfort) may be in conflict with such actions. Empirical research on predictors of energy-related investment decisions often focuses on the perception of economic and technical features of investment objects and has provided strong evidence that rational motives play an important role in decision-making processes.
While households might certainly have rational motives for engaging in energy-saving actions, consumer psychology also highlights the role of norm-directed motives. Norms can be defined as shared expectations of appropriate behavior and are commonly differentiated into a moral and a social dimension. The moral dimension, also referred to as the personal norm, reflects an individual’s own rules or expectations. The social dimension, also referred to as social norms, involves (perceived) group rules or expectations. Regarding the moral dimension, climate change has fatal consequences for people who live in less privileged conditions, future generations, long-existing ecosystems and endangered species. Household members might feel morally obligated to contribute to mitigating climate change in order to reduce these consequences. Thus, moral motives should generally support the uptake of energy-saving investment objects.
In some cases, moral motives might suggest the same behavior as rational motives, such as when energy-saving behavior also saves money. In other cases, moral motives might contradict rational motives. For example, in Germany in 2016, the total cost of ownership for an electric car was higher than that of a combustion engine car for the average household. Furthermore, the two kinds of motives are not necessarily mutually exclusive when it comes to mitigating climate change for example, safeguarding natural resources, preventing future extreme weather conditions, or preventing future economic crises certainly imply strong rational incentives for a household to engage in energy-saving behavior.
Regarding the social dimension, research has provided evidence for two main roles of social norms: First, they provide orientation, as they communicate information about the social standard of behavior (informational role). Second, they can lead to social pressure, in which individuals think about others reactions to their own behavior. Thus, social norms may either support or be in conflict with the uptake of energy-saving investment objects, depending on characteristics of the individual household, its social surroundings, and the diffusion of the investment object.
Empirical studies of energy-related investment decisions less often focus on investigating norm-directed motives. Moreover, some findings are ambiguous and more research is needed to further clarify the importance of norm-directed motives in different decision domains. However, enough studies have found significant effects to conclude that these motives have at least some relevance. In sum, prior research suggests the relevance of both rational and norm-directed motives in the context of energy-related investment decisions in households.
The general trends and findings described above are also reflected in the specific decision context of electric car adoption. A huge body of research focuses on rational adoption motives, emphasizing the relevance of individuals’ financial and technological evaluations of electric cars. Much fewer research has explored the role of norm-directed motives in more depth. These studies indicate at least some relevance of moral and social motives in this decision context as well. However, it is unclear to what degree different types of motives influence electric car adoption and how these motives interact, i.e. whether or not these motives mutually reinforce or interfere with one another.
In consumer psychology, there is a longstanding controversy as to whether moral motives are undermined by other motives (such as rational motives) in the context of behaviors involving high financial costs and/or a high amount of effort. In the context of electric car adoption, some studies building on work on different motives for car use explore these questions in more depth. These studies indicate that the influence of norm-directed motives on adoption intention is relatively equal to that of rational motives and that the two kinds of motives are highly correlated. However, more research is needed to confirm these findings and further clarify the interplay between different kinds of motives.
Action models are a particularly suitable approach for systematically investigating the relevance and interplay of motives underlying behavior. They have at least two important advantages: First, from a theoretical perspective, they allow for comprehensive investigations, enabling researchers to compare the relevance of different types of predictors while simultaneously investigating complex interactions between them. Second, from a practical perspective, insights from action models are very helpful for developing suitable political support schemes. Integrated action models with several types of motives have proven especially useful in terms of comprehensive investigation. In a recent example, applied three action models from different research traditions to explain the adoption of solar photovoltaic systems. They could demonstrate that both rational and norm-directed motives play an important role and that an integrative model with both rational and norm-related predictors explained the most variance. However, action models have rarely been applied in research on electric car adoption as well as research on energy-related investment decisions in general.
Adapted from Bobeth, S. and Kastner, I., 2020. Buying an electric car: A rational choice or a norm-directed behavior?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, pp.236-258.
Answer question ONE and any THREE out of the remaining FOUR questions (4 x 12.5 = 50 marks each)
Briefly explain the 3 types of reference group influences. Which type is most suited to promote electric cars? Why? (2.5 marks).
Using the information from the case, compare rational choice vs. norm-directed behavior. Which one would you use to promote Nissan LEAF? Why? (2.5 marks).
Other than baby boomers, identify any generational cohort you studied in this course. Then, develop an electric car (any brand) advertising copy to target this cohort. (2.5 marks).
Amongst Maslows hierarchy of needs, which need is most appropriate for developing marketing strategies of electric cars. Explain why. (2.5 marks).
Explain how the concept of shaping could be used to promote Nissan LEAF. Create your own process of shaping in a diagram to demonstrate your understanding. (2.5 marks).
Explain how marketers can utilize the attitude change strategies to change consumers attitudes toward buying electric cars. As part of your answer, create a possible campaign to change attitudes. (12.5 marks).
Based on course material on situational influences, elaborate how situational influences could effectively be used by marketers of electric cars. (12.5 marks).
As a consumer behaviour expert, Nissan has hired you as a marketing consultant. Nissan is generally not considered a premium brand. But your first project is on premiumisation of Nissan LEAF. Drawing from a range of theories, models and concepts you learned in this course, explain how would you premiums Nissan LEAF? (12.5 marks).
Post-purchases process is the last stage of consumer decision making. Explain the possible post purchase processes of a hypothetical consumer who belongs to the baby boomer generation in Melbourne, who recently bought a Nissan LEAF 2019. (12.5 marks).
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.